T

Forward-Deployed AI Engineer

Truss · Austin, TX

🔥12 people viewed this job

About the Role

Remote (US or Canada) • Full-time • Engineering • 6+ years Canada remote: CAD 150K – 250K • US remote: USD 125K – 175K • 0.25% – 0.50% equity WE ALSO OFFER IN PERSON IN AUSTIN TEXAS STARTING JAN 1 2026 Sanity Check • Remote is this seat. US or Canada. TN is OK if you are Canadian. We are not sponsoring other visas. Pay is in the currency listed for that location: CAD if you are remote in Canada, USD if you are remote in the US. • You have been a working engineer for at least six years. This field is new. We do not expect six years of "AI engineer" on a resume. We do expect you have shipped real software for a long time, and that the AI/agent work is the reason you want this job. • Show the work. A harness, an eval loop, an agent skill pack, or a real open-source contribution we can click. Blog posts about "using ChatGPT" are not proof. • This is an engineering seat. You will own production internal AI systems (harness + fraud/CS back office) and accelerate the eng team. Not DevRel. Not enablement theater. Not a prompt intern. About The Role Truss is a ~dozen-person YC fintech (S21) building banking and payments for construction. Real accounts, instant ledgering, money movement that has to be right. We already run on AI in two places, and both need a full-time owner. • Internal AI systems that are already in production. We have started an internal AI harness. Our fraud and customer-support back office is built with AI: case work, review, the ops surface, not a chatbot bolted on the side. That system needs someone who maintains it, extends it, and treats it like a product, every day. • The engineering factory. The team already ships in Cursor / Claude Code. Setup is uneven. Venvs, VMs, skills, and repos drift. Skills rot. We do not have a daily picture of what shipped or how good the code is. You make every engineer dangerous in the same way. You sit on the engineering team as a forward-deployed AI engineer. Embedded with the people doing the work. You own the harness and the back office as real software. You also own environments, team skills, repo contracts, quality scrape jobs, and process so the factory gets tighter every week. If you only want to write product features, stop. If you only want to do "AI enablement" and will not own the back office, stop. If you want to build and run the AI layer the company already depends on, keep reading. What You'll Actually Do • Own the internal AI harness. It exists. You maintain it, harden it, and keep building it full time. Evals, tool wiring, sandboxes, whatever makes agents reliable here. • Own the AI back office. Fraud and customer support already run on an AI-built back office. You extend it, keep it correct, and sit with ops when a case flow is wrong. This is production, not a demo. • Make every engineer's environment actually work. Cursor, agent runtimes, virtualenvs, VMs, secrets, language toolchains. When someone clones a repo, the agent can boot, test, and ship. You notice when it cannot. • Own team skill sets. Shared skills for our stack and our way of working. You keep them current. Stale skills are a bug you fix, not a wiki someone might read. • Set the repos up for agents, not just humans. Devcontainers or equivalent, task runners, test entrypoints, lint, fixtures, docs the model can follow. The factory has a contract. • Build jobs that scrape the work. Daily signal on what shipped, review quality, test health, agent usage, where we are slow or sloppy. Improve the factory. Do not build a vanity dashboard. • Install process that sticks. How we open PRs, how we review with agents, how we promote a skill, how we kill a bad one. Boring, enforced, light. • Sit with the people who use it. Engineers and ops. You watch a session or a case fail and fix the harness, the skill, or the back office. You do not throw a Notion page over the wall. What We're Looking For • 6+ years as an engineer, shipping production software. Languages and stacks matter less than: you have been in the mess long enough to have taste. • Proof we can click: a harness, an eval framework, an agent/skill system, or a meaningful open-source contribution in this area. Link it at the top. "I use Cursor a lot" is not enough. • You have set up other people's environments, not only your own. Dotfiles-as-theater does not count. Repos that boot, tests that run, agents that have the tools they need. • You treat harnesses, skills, and the back office like production code: versioned, reviewed, deprecated when they rot. Comfortable in Python/TypeScript or similar: CI, scrapers, MCP/tool servers, sandboxes, ops UIs. • Small-team operator. You will not have a platform org. You are the function for internal AI and eng acceleration. • Must meet the location / work-auth rules in Sanity Check. This Is Not the Role If • You have fewer than ~six years writing production software • Your AI story is ChatGPT in the browser and a LinkedIn course • You want to be a product IC who "also helps

A truss is an assembly of members such as beams, connected by nodes, that creates a rigid structure.

💬 Developer Questions

Ask the team a question — answers show up here

🎯

What does the interview process look like?

🤖

What AI/vibe coding tools does the team use daily?

👥

How big is the engineering team?

Is the team fully async or are there required meetings?

🚀

What does onboarding look like for remote hires?

🔧

Can you share more about the tech stack and architecture?

📈

What does career growth look like in this role?

📅

What does a typical day look like?

💰

Is there a salary range you can share?

📊

Is equity or stock options part of the package?

🌍

Are there timezone requirements or preferences?

🛂

Do you sponsor work visas?

🏢 Is this your listing? Claim it to answer questions

Similar Jobs

Helpful resources

Hiring for a similar role? Post your job here — it's free →